Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Portrait of Goffredo Mameli

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 00:42, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Portrait of Goffredo Mameli

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined prod. No notability for this drawing (the artist obviously is notable). This drawing doesn't seem to have been the subject of significant independent attention. Note that the site used as a source, while being an extremely useful source in itself, is not an indicator of notability, being a directory of "53,203,536 artworks, artefacts, books, videos and sounds from across Europe."[1] Most of these 53million works don't have the notability for a separate article, and I see no reason why this one would be an exception. Fram (talk) 10:22, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:09, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:09, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:26, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no indication of notability. If this material was presented in a more general article like List of artworks by Roberto Bompiani I would have been fine with it. Blythwood (talk) 14:18, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, apparently there are not enough contents for an article [2], and there are too many portraits of Goffredo Mameli for a redirect. Cavarrone 08:38, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.