Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Porter Byrum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) Let'srun (talk) 02:53, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Porter Byrum

Porter Byrum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to be notable. Sourced primarily from obituaries and two WP:ROUTINE articles on the sale of a development the subject sold. glman (talk) 02:36, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Law, Military, and North Carolina. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:26, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Passes WP:GNG. Has widespread coverage. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 05:34, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• keep seems to meet WP:GNG with sources in article. Notability can become apparent on death. Here's an additional source [1] —siroχo 09:46, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.