Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pornopedia
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 09:44, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Pornopedia
- Pornopedia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable website; fails WP:WEB. I'm unable to find any coverage of this website in reliable sources; all the sources provided so far are either trivial or non-independent of the subject. Robofish (talk) 16:05, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 16:07, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I vote delete, almost everything in the article is either useless, or advertising a website with very little notability. Kevinmon (talk) 01:39, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- delete
and bookmarkthe only google news hit is about wikipedia, suprisingly --UltraMagnusspeak 20:46, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:10, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for lack of reliable sources. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 00:15, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- delete Does not seem to have the significant coverage in multiple independent and reliable sources required by WP:N to show notability. Edison (talk) 01:50, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not seeing reliable sources in searching Google, Google News, Google Books, Google Scholar. Fails WP:WEB, WP:RS JohnWBarber (talk) 15:09, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.