Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poplar Linens

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 13:10, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Poplar Linens

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable small company which doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH. Subject is a small (5 to 50 person?) textile company, which is similar to any other equivalent company, and hasn't been the subject of any significant coverage. As part of a WP:BEFORE exercise, I have improved, found or added a number of sources to support the text. While these sources support the text, none of them materially support a claim to notability (in each case the sources are the subject's own press releases, website, or news articles which mention the subject but which are substantially about something else). Outside of the refs in the article, various searches in national news sources, for example in the Irish Times or the Irish Examiner, returns barely a handful of results. A majority of which are trivial passing mentions or other ROTM coverage that doesn't contribute to CORPDEPTH/SIGCOV. Guliolopez (talk) 12:48, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Guliolopez (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Guliolopez (talk) 12:52, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unreliable sources, press releases, passing mentions... it does not seem to meet WP:NCORP. MarioGom (talk) 11:34, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.