Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Popface

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:02, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Popface

Popface (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:BAND. Opting for AfD over PROD in order to allow Norwegian speakers to analyse Norwegian sources, despite machine translation not appearing to turn up much WP:SIGCOV. SITH (talk) 00:12, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 00:58, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 00:58, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 00:58, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment There are signed and have three albums released. I suggest looking for references. scope_creep^Talk 10:17, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Almost zero play on Spotify after 6 years. Found an newspaper article saying they haven't broken through yet and not made a penny. Fail WP:BAND. scope_creep^Talk 10:22, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete this unsourced atrocity. Trillfendi (talk) 17:48, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.