Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pop Art (Genre)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 21:47, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pop Art (Genre)

A "genre" that hasn't reached any notability. Recently created, only "808s & Heartbreak" will follow the genre. Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 07:32, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: West most certainly did not coin this term. ^Law_shoot! 10:05, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable. Seems like an intention to create a free ride for Kanye West on a dab page. Lots of entertainers like to coin a term to describe how fresh, different and innovative they think they are. The irony here is that a supposedly original music form is being described by a very unoriginal name. Mandsford (talk) 16:37, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:08, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Misleading non-notable neologism. AlexTiefling (talk) 12:53, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - Very misleading, considering pop art's more important usage. And far from notable. Tris2000 (talk) 17:08, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: A passing neologism for an old idea. Surprised we have no article for Poptimism, critical appreciation of pop music, though. 86.44.21.224 (talk) 04:07, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.