Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pop Art, Inc.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:54, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pop Art, Inc.

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article looks promotional, signs of promotional editing present, and WP:BEFORE check result is sorely lacking in sources that would meet our significant coverage requirements per WP:NCORP and a daily average view of 2 per day going back as long as the data is available is not a good indication of notability and it should be DELETED. Graywalls (talk) 22:49, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Advertising, Companies, Software, and Oregon. Graywalls (talk) 22:49, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Concur with the nom. Sources are mostly press releases and corporate puff, nothing for WP:GNG. Let'srun (talk) 23:06, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator's BEFORE check. Normally I would still check refs myself but this sentence from the article speaks directly to notability:
- "In 2013, Pop Art was recognized by Portland Business Journal as the 7th largest digital marketing company by gross income and the 22nd largest marketing firm overall by gross income in Oregon."

Sort of like being ranked New Zealand's fourth most popular guitar-based digi-bongo acapella-rap-funk-comedy folk duo but not as notable.

--A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 00:56, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Violates WP:NOTPROMO, TNT at best, but BEFORE does not seem promising. —siro χ o 05:46, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Articles are passing mentions and listicles. Royal88888 (talk) 07:55, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Devoke water 18:30, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a promotional page, much of which describes the services provided and awards received. Suitskvarts (talk) 06:17, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:18, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.