Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pokémon Red (Famicom)
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 03:08, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Pokémon Red (Famicom)
- Pokémon Red (Famicom) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable, a "hack" game Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:58, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - There is nothing to indicate that this is anything other than a non-notable hack of an original game. I also asked for a reason why he removed the first PROD template I put on and there was no response. --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 22:12, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The article is completely unsourced and does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of its subject. Furthermore, because the article subject itself is a non-notable unauthorized bootleg video game, it would be inappropriate to convert this page into a redirect. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 23:15, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (Search video game sources) –MuZemike 01:24, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Seems pretty straightfoward to me. I can't find a single reference to this thing or the company that made it except on warez and ROM sites. While I suppose it could be notable within the ROM hacking community, I don't believe that is sufficient to fulfill notability requirements here. (am I supposed to put this above or below that note there?) Keyok (talk) 01:30, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – I could not find anything about this bootleg anywhere besides links to video sites, "download this ROM" sites, and otherwise unreliable blogs and forums. –MuZemike 01:56, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no evidence given (and probably no evidence exists) of non-trivial mention in independent published reliable sources. RJaguar3 | u | t 06:43, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki to the Gaming Wikia. 76.66.192.55 (talk) 05:26, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.