Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PoBros Inc.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar ⨹ 16:00, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PoBros Inc.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails Wikipedia:CORP. The article is sourced with questionable sources, primary sources and reviews or articles about the games made by the company. Parts of the article also comes off as advertising for the company too. GamerPro64 22:49, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 21:52, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 21:52, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 21:52, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Does look to fail WP:CORPDEPTH. It would furthermore be pretty rare for a developer to have an article before any of its software/products/games (not that that's a requirement). — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 21:53, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No significant coverage by independent reliable sources; in a search I found only a press relelase. --MelanieN (talk) 03:18, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToonLucas22 (talk) 00:52, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.