Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plethora (2nd nomination)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Soft redirect to wiktionary. Everybody agrees the front-facing content of this page should be removed, so this should work nicely. I don't think there's a good reason to delete the page first, but do correct me if I'm wrong. ~ Amory (utc) 14:22, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Plethora (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All targets violate MOS:DABMENTION, there is no specialized use of the word in wikipedia. Also WP:DABDIC. This DAB has been deleted 5 times. Hoof Hearted (talk) 17:57, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 16:01, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 16:01, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Tagged as speedy delete, G6 for being an orphaned disambigious page, A11 for being an ad, A1 for being a page of no notability. I suspect it's a thinly vailed ad for the Plethora Corporation mentioned in the article (last in the list)--Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 16:04, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I've declined the speedy, as I don't think any of those criteria apply. That said, I don't see the use of this page, per nom. Writ Keeper  17:55, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - this borders on DicDef, and fails DABMention. I wouldn't oppose a redirect to Flushing (physiology) if a reliable source were found and incorporated into the article to fulfill DABmention. MarginalCost (talk) 18:10, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Do not delete. The page receives over sixty views a day [1], so it definitely is something that readers are searching for. The title seems to meet the criteria for becoming a soft redirect to wiktionary. The only thing giving me pause is the fact that at least some of the more specialised meanings of "plethora" are covered here on wikipedia: the OED gives the obsolete meaning of "overabundance of one or more humours" (the concept doesn't appear to be treated at Humorism), as well as the contemporary meanings "excessive volume of blood (hypervolaemia or, now rarely, polycythaemia)", and "excessive fullness of blood vessels". The question is whether we'll be serving our readers best by having a dab page listing a few obscure medical meanings, or redirecting them to wiktionary. – Uanfala (talk) 19:34, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. – Uanfala (talk) 19:34, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.