Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Playbill Vault

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Playbill. What, if any, to merge is left toeditoral judgment Courcelles 21:25, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Playbill Vault

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Brand new web site - this is just a little bit too soon to be notable, espectially since the site is in beta. I suspect this is being done to promote the website. Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 07:16, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --Legis (talk - contribs) 07:22, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect/merge to Playbill, the parent publication of this web site. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 08:28, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect/merge to Playbill. Is only a few days old and has not attracted any reliable independent sources. Judging by the number of backlinks by the same creator from the same cerator on other Wikipedia pages, I also suspect some kind of publicity agenda. The site may turn out to become as notable as IMDB in the future, but let's wait until it it does. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:29, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.