Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pixel Toys

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. At this time, there is clear consensus to delete this article. I have no prejudice towards its recreation/consideration should notability increase in the future. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 00:24, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pixel Toys

Pixel Toys (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NCORP. The only example of significant coverage provided is [1], which still relies heavily on an interview with the founder. Other coverage doesn't discuss the subject to any appreciable depth. I wasn't able to find anything better online. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 00:13, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 00:13, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 00:13, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 00:13, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Rosguill, can you see the refideas I have listed on the talk page? Some of them are interviews but others are decent in-depth, including the local paper and MCVUK. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:35, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  AngusWOOF, I hadn't, which was my bad. That having been said, they all appear to be primarily interviews. I'm less confident that this is non-notable than I was before looking at that list, but ultimately I think I still come down on the non-notable side. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 00:39, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• KEEP A search in Google news brings up lot's more news sources such as Venture Beat and lot's of game related publications. Expertwikiguy (talk) 01:39, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Expertwikiguy, I see a lot of press releases, not much that passes the NCORP criteria. Could you pick out an article or two in particular that you think qualifies? _signed, Rosguill ^talk 01:51, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, The company doesn't seem notable. I did a Google search and all that came up was a few articles about product releases. Which are trivial coverage. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:13, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, fails GNG/WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 12:43, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.