Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pina Conti

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 18:20, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pina Conti

Pina Conti (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly sourced article since its creation over 10 years ago. Searches turned up virtually zero in-depth coverage so she does not meet WP:GNG. Neither does she pass WP:ENTERTAINER or WP:NACTOR. Onel5969 TT me 11:59, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 TT me 11:59, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 TT me 12:00, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • 'Delete This is one of the worst cases of "Wikipedia is not IMDb" that I have seen. Wikipedia does not aim to have articles on everyone who ever appeared in a film, or even on everyone who appeared in the top 10 or so films by theatre revenues each year.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:35, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Not notable unsourced pseudo BLP that should have been deleted a long time ago. Otr500 (talk) 05:20, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.