Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piedmont Youth Orchestra

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of youth orchestras in the United States . Without prejudice to something done at Music of North Carolina. MBisanz ^talk 00:20, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Piedmont Youth Orchestra

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

tagged for notability for 5 years and unref; I couldn't verify notability Boleyn (talk) 21:45, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 14:16, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 14:16, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 14:16, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not notable. lacks significant coverage in 3rd party sources. I'm finding some limited mentions in newspapers in NC but only in calendar type entries RadioFan (talk) 01:09, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:07, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and Redirect to List of youth orchestras in the United States This article has two unreferenced BLPs, so the edit history should be deleted. When the encyclopedia is finished, this topic might be covered in an article entitled Music Arts in Chapel Hill. Right now, the only place to target the redirect is List of youth orchestras in the United States. Unscintillating (talk) 03:55, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I saw this and thought Orchestra Sinfonica Giovanile del Piemonte www.orchestragiovanile.it, then I see it's North Carolina.... I have added 2 sources and deleted the 2x BLP sections (but that doesn't help with edit history). After that it doesn't seem much worse than anything else in Category:Youth organizations based in North Carolina‎ or indeed anything bluelinked in List of youth orchestras in the United States. Before Music Arts in Chapel Hill, what about Arts in North Carolina? In ictu oculi (talk) 14:39, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I would prefer a merge to Music of North Carolina - that article lacks any information on community music and youth orchestras, and this article (ruthlessly compressed) would become a useful short paragraph there. In ictu oculi (talk) 05:27, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That is a laudable idea (and good research finding the article), but can it wait until the edit history is deleted? P.S. What I meant is not to merge, but to rewrite any new material from scratch so as to avoid WP:MAD. Unscintillating (talk) 19:33, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I posted the sources and categories in the current article, minus a youtube link, on the talk page here, WT:Articles for deletion/Piedmont Youth Orchestra. Unscintillating (talk) 19:59, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 03:03, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Question Why was this relisted, what resolution is the relister seeking? Unscintillating (talk) 23:39, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I would have loved for someone to assess the sources you listed> I see RadioFan has, but I was hoping for more discussion. I see that is unlikely, so I'll close now. MBisanz ^talk 00:19, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.