Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pichilemunews

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarah-Jane (talk) 13:19, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pichilemunews

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

News website for town of 13,000 fails WP:NWEB. Sources are itself, two similar websites from the same town (one of which is defunct), and a mention in a government document where it received a two thousand-dollar subsidy. Deleted from eswiki for lack of notability. Vrac (talk) 02:02, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator. Local online-only newspaper of tiny village. Softlavender (talk) 04:39, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:16, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:16, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:17, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Chile-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:17, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I'm simply not seeing any better improvement unless this can be mentioned at the local community's article. Pinging past user Brianhe and also DGG who may be interested to comment. SwisterTwister talk 05:57, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Per common practice this should be redirected to the Media section of Pichilemu, rather than deleting 191.112.114.141 (talk) 20:05, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well well, a Chilean IP whose first edit is to this AFD, who could it be? If the consensus is to delete, it gets deleted. That is the common practice. Vrac (talk) 01:50, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, it is not notable. The gruesome Scourge of Trumpton 16:18, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.