Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phutureprimitive

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 00:22, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Phutureprimitive

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable musician. Article only has one source, which is the musician's home page. Other than that, can't really find much information about him. Article previously put up for BLPPROD so can't prod this one. LionMans Account (talk) 23:47, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 03:05, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 03:05, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:MUSICBIO. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:02, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now as my searches found nothing good aside from this and this. SwisterTwister talk 05:23, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:MUSICBIO does have a bullet point about indie labels but rarely have I found that to be any source in determining notability. In this particular case, it doesn't seem like it either with WP:SIGCOV. Mkdw ^talk 00:58, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:MUSICBIO and appear to be WP:PROMOTIONAL. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 12:43, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.