Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phuraloung

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:21, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Phuraloung (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article, previously located at Phuraloung and All Assam Phuralong Society, is unclear on what subject it's exactly supposed to cover. Most of it seems to be about the organization/movement, which doesn't seem to satisfy the notability guidelines. It was draftified by Winged Blades of Godric in January 2019, but I think it deserves to go through AfD in case other editors have better ideas of how to deal with the subject. Paul_012 (talk) 19:03, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Paul_012 (talk) 19:03, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Paul_012 (talk) 19:03, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Support: This page serves no purpose. Chaipau (talk) 19:06, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Lacking Notability and as said above, serves no purpose. Santoshdts (talk) 19:18, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: As per comments above. Also, article created by sockpuppeteer. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 19:39, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per all of the above Spiderone 11:49, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong keep Reading the article, this is a religious cultural group relating to the Tai Ahom people. The article is also clearly sourced with a wide variety of sources that satisfy the notability guidelines. To restate. the article is both verifiable and notable, and the arguments to delete it are very thin and haven't sufficiently refuted it's notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.7.57.141 (talk) 08:41, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.