Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phone yawn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 02:59, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Phone yawn

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Phase is wp:neo and wp:dictionary ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 18:55, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, insufficiently sourced neologism. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:56, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above - even the article says the term was coined in 2011 on Urban Dictionary. Bearian (talk) 20:06, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: One reliable source, one ref to Urban Dictionary, and one to another Wikipedia article. Maybe (and this is a big maybe) merge into Yawn if notability can be established, but I seriously doubt it will. I found a few forum posts asking about it, but nothing else. Supernerd11 :D Firemind ^_^ Pokedex 20:16, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NEO. Much of the article content was copied and pasted from Urban Dictionary (which is WP:UGC and most definitely not a reliable source). --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 20:42, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:42, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:42, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This isn't urban dictionary. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:56, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Yeah, this probably could have been speedy deleted but it should go for WP:NOTNEO anyway. Ducknish (talk) 22:09, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.