Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phone Bhoot

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:44, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Phone Bhoot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This unreleased film does not satisfy film notability. In particular, it does not satisfy the guidelines on unreleased films, according to which unreleased films are only notable if production itself has been notable, and this article says only that principal photography has taken place, nothing to indicate that it was notable.

Was Proposed for deletion. PROD removed without explanation, which is the author's right.

Google search finds this article, and tries to offer 'Phone Booth'.

Listing a film that is still in development at this point is promotional. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:07, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:07, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:07, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Vote to delete - as the nominator says, it does not satisfy notability. Aasim 17:51, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG Spiderone 12:23, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per nomination Sweboi (talk) 15:33, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and wait until it is more notable. Zindagi713 (talk) 04:56, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:TOOSOON, in essence. None of the sources offer anything in-depth, so fails WP:GNG. Sources are low-quality WP:BOMBARD. Since the film is not released, this is basically an advertisement. Author's only edits are about this movie, which sounds like a big COI, so there's nothing to salvage until there is proper reception after release. Draft copy-pasted to mainspace with no AfC approval and PROD removed with no explanation, so they are clearly interested in following the process. Furthermore, their first edits manage to format and present everything relatively nicely, so they are probably some PR firm anyway. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 17:59, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.