Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philopoemen Constantinidi

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Liz Read! Talk! 08:16, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Philopoemen Constantinidi

Philopoemen Constantinidi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

looks like nonnotable artist. No articlre improvemebt since it was tagged in April - Altenmann >talk 06:37, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep notable per collection at Centre Pompidou and Benezit encyclopedic entry. Article needs improvement Hermann Heilner Giebenrath (talk) 10:48, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment This looks like the article on in Hellenica World The site looks so old, that it might precede the Wikipedia article. https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Philopoemen+Constantinidi&oldid=&use_engine=0&use_links=0&turnitin=0&action=compare&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.hellenicaworld.com%2FGreece%2FPerson%2Fen%2FPhilopoemenConstantinidi.html So sorry. Hellenica World was copied from Wikipedia and says so. Looking for a citation for death date. --WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 22:04, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - still a very ugly article, but I think it now has enough citations for WP:ARTIST. Very close paraphrasing of parts of Benezit. --WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 02:29, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, can we please have arguments based in policy and guidelines that focus on whether or not notability can be established? Please be specific and avoid general statements.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:12, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Sorry I wasn't more specific... I agree with Hermann Heilner Giebenrath that being in the collection at Centre Pompidou and Benezit encyclopedic entry establishes notability WP:ARTIST for purposes of being included in Wikipedia. --WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 22:28, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.