Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phillips explosion of 1999
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Phillips Petroleum Company. No prejudice against keeping if Art Smart comes through with his sources (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:07, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Phillips explosion of 1999 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Lacks the historical notability for its own article per WP:NOT#NEWS. The criteria it lacks are articulated at Wikipedia:News_articles#Criteria. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Habanero-tan (talk • contribs) 2009/04/21 03:04:58
- This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 16:40, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. -- Jmundo 17:22, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge any appropriate content to Phillips Petroleum Company or delete. Karanacs (talk) 17:36, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with Phillips Petroleum Company. The event is not notable enough to have its own article. Timmeh! 21:12, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep for now. In the next few days, I will provide additional reliable information to ensure satisfaction of notability standards. Thanks. --Art Smart Chart/Heart 01:51, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:51, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge - put all 3 Accidents into 1 Article seperate from the main company Article. Phillips Disaster Phillips explosion of 2000 & Phillips explosion of 1999 would all fit nicely into 1 Article but would bloat the company Article. Exit2DOS2000•T•C• 11:11, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.