Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philippine E-Journals
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. In addition to the concern about notability, the descriptions of the journals appear to have been copied directly from the website in violation of copyright, so unfortunately I cannot userfy the content. RL0919 (talk) 21:41, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Philippine E-Journals (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is basically a list of the journals contained in a directory. No independent sources. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 21:10, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 21:10, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
- No independent sources => no notability. Delete. --Randykitty (talk) 21:45, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
- Question. Can this be userfied or transwikied? It's useful for our core readership although not obviously notable. (I realize this is not an argument.) Bearian (talk) 15:27, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.