Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phil America
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. J04n(talk page) 00:01, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Phil America (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Inadequately sourced article about seemingly non-notable author/artist. I'm unable to find any reliable sources that cover the subject in any detail. Fails WP:AUTHOR - MrX 23:07, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. czar · · 23:26, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. czar · · 23:26, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 00:36, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:25, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LFaraone 02:39, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable article without verifiable sources. TheMindsEye (talk) 15:01, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep. Significant coverage in Incognito Magazine (not available online) and briefer mentions in The Infamous and Goodfellas Magazine exist, and coverage on Utah & Ether's blog might constitute a reliable source per the third paragraph of WP:UGC. Definitely a borderline case though – if any of the above can be conclusively shown to fall on the wrong side of WP:RS (or, on the other hand, if there are other sources I've missed) I can imagine changing my mind. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 10:36, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.