Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peyami Gurel
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 23:52, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Peyami Gurel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails WP:Creative. No significant coverage in 3rd party sources, perhaps an autobiography. Petropoxy (Lithoderm Proxy) (talk) 22:08, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. —Petropoxy (Lithoderm Proxy) (talk) 22:11, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable.--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 23:11, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn...Modernist (talk) 20:09, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Talk · Review 00:02, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment We may be dealing with cross-wiki self promotion in this case, as the French version is mainly the work of two single-purpose accounts Serda and Temurah, the account BahadirMurat on the German Wiki, and Temurah again on the Turkish wiki, all within the last month or so. It seems that they are all translations of the article on the Turkish wiki, which might have originally been a copyright violation, from what I can gather by online translations:[1], the entry by User:Temurah reads approx. "Why delete the entry on Peyami Gürel? This is about how we need to follow a procedure. In his biography by my own site. I cannot think of a better way do it. His knowledge and permission to have it .... Where do I apply for this?" Petropoxy (Lithoderm Proxy) (talk) 02:38, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.