Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Petru Buzgău

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 20:11, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Petru Buzgău

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet wikipedia notability criteria for academics WP:Notability (academics) or WP:Creative Polargeo (talk) 16:29, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. —Polargeo (talk) 16:31, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I don't see how the nominator's rationale for deletion has anything to do with the subject. The article doesn't claim that he's any kind of academic, but a painter. WP:CREATIVE is the right guideline. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:18, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I was adding a whole load of academic artists. I have added the correct one now. Polargeo (talk) 08:58, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 23:50, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:CREATIVE, and I can't find enough reliable sources to support general notability.--Unionhawk ^Talk ^E-mail ^Review 03:41, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for lack of multiple independent sources establishing notability. - Biruitorul ^Talk 21:39, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.