Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Reynosa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:09, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Reynosa

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable local author known for minor works and non-notable painting related events. Has a self-published book that lacks WP:N. References are minor in nature or are for published articles. Appears to fail WP:N and WP:BIO. reddogsix (talk) 21:33, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:49, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - sounds totally run of the mill as a Huffington Post blogger. Not really well-sourced. Bearian (talk) 00:28, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as entirely trivial and unconvincing, with my WorldCat searches finding nothing better at all and the article, regardless of its size, is still trivial. SwisterTwister talk 03:20, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable blogger.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:20, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.