Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Miller (Literary Manager)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 18:13, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Miller (Literary Manager)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NOTE The page "Peter Miller (Literary Manager)" (links | edit) has been moved to "Peter Miller (literary manager)"

I can only find a few passing mentions and quotes of the subject (e.g. NY Magazine, Mental Floss Magazine) and two more detailed mentions (NYTimes and WRMEA) that mention him a few times regarding a plagiarism lawsuit against him.

The NYT article mentions his name in passing three times, quotes him once, and has quotes one sentence from a lawsuit's allegations against him. The WRMEA article probably is significant coverage from a notable source (probably reliable). Overall, there's simply not enough for WP:GNG. — MarkH₂₁^talk 23:07, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — MarkH₂₁^talk 23:07, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. — MarkH₂₁^talk 23:07, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:02, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:58, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE The page "Peter Miller (Literary Manager)" (links | edit) has been moved to "Peter Miller (literary manager)"

Delete per nom. Loksmythe (talk) 21:33, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete looking at the other notable agents mentioned, he is not at that level. And in any case this was added by a COI editor, and could be deleted on that reason alone, because nothing in itcan be assummed to be NPOV. DGG ( talk ) 10:23, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I agree with the above, and unless some expert source can be found to help establish his notability in the field, he would no doubt fail the GNG. PK650 (talk) 22:46, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.