Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Ibold

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:46, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Ibold

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm unable to find any coverage of this person in reliable sources which would indicate that WP:BIO can be met. SmartSE (talk) 16:58, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and United States of America. SmartSE (talk) 16:58, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:00, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Opting not for soft deletion. Has someone considered the sources linked on the TP?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 18:05, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:TNT and WP:NOTWEBHOST. We are not LinkedIn. Bearian (talk) 18:05, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Lamona placed some sources on the article talk page. I have reviewed these but it doesn't change my mind about not meeting BIO, as the mentions are brief and provide no biographical information. SmartSE (talk) 19:12, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Article fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. I have searched online and was able to verify that the article's subject did exist, but nothing that would contribute to the notability of the subject or warrant an article on Wikipedia. I also reviewed the two sources presented on the article's talk page and they are both very much trivial mentions that wouldn't contribute to notability in any way - Aoidh (talk) 00:16, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.