Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Donnelly (artist)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 18:42, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Peter Donnelly (artist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:06, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Artists, and New Zealand. UtherSRG (talk) 17:06, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - This person does not meet notability criteria for WP:NARTIST. Mostly what was found online is social media and blogs. There is a little local human-interest coverage, but not enough to meet WP:GNG; I can't find anything that one would normally see like reviews of his work in notable art magazine, museum collections, etc. Netherzone (talk) 19:41, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:ARTIST. LibStar (talk) 06:00, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete I do not find good sources for this person. Lots of Peter Donnellys, but this one is not notable. --WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 22:34, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.