Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pet tattoo
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:48, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
- Pet tattoo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Zero evidence of notability. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 02:49, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Strong keep - per WP:NRVE and WP:GNG. Topic notability is based upon available sources, rather than the state of sourcing in articles. Evidence of notability includes, but is not limited to:
- Keep - The article could stand to be beefed up, but there is significant coverage of the phenomenon. I'd say it meets notability requirements. Bali88 (talk) 17:51, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep per Northamerica1000 who's found alot of sources, Also AFD isn't for clean up solutions. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 01:38, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:30, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep per notability demonstrated by Northamerica1000--Coin945 (talk) 19:16, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.