Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perfect Wedding (play)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. (non-admin closure). —Mythdon 23:04, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect Wedding (play) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is nothing in this unsourced article that indicates this play is notable. I find it fascinating that one of the actors in one of the productions is the Duchess of Cambridge. Bbb23 (talk) 15:55, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:24, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:24, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:24, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:48, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, jcc (tea and biscuits) 17:04, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete there's a bit of coverage by the New York Times, but significant coverage is needed, and frankly I'm not seeing it. I can however see some regional level reviews, so this could swing either way. I can't seem to find an explicit notability guideline for plays, so going by GNG and the similar NFILM, reviews by national level media organisations are needed, and as said I can't find any bar the NY Times. jcc (tea and biscuits) 17:10, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: I'd suggest the tag for sources is enough. A play that's had that many different productions with different casts ought to prevent a deletion for the time being.  • DP •  {huh?} 16:43, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.