Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/People's Postcode Lottery

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Lottery#United Kingdom. (non-admin closure) Bait30 ^{Talk 2 me pls?} 14:04, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

People's Postcode Lottery

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All of these sources are closely connected to the Postcode Lottery and are unreliable. I think it would be best to delete this article, and start it from scratch in a non-promotional manner with reliable sources to back up claims. QueenofBithynia (talk) 09:50, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. QueenofBithynia (talk) 09:50, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - with massive pruning it can be a short paragraph in Lottery#United_Kingdom. There are many news articles about winners, and acknowledgements of grants, but it is all WP:NOT. Springnuts (talk) 12:06, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - definitely would be fine merged into Lottery#United_Kingdom Zippybonzo (talk) 14:42, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - This seems a sensible way forward, probably with a redirect as I think it is a plausible topic that people would search for. I would agree there is probably not enough independent coverage for an article on its own. Dunarc (talk) 20:57, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.