Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pengurusan Aset Air

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:32, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pengurusan Aset Air

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of corporate notability. The company exists; every company exists. Google search turns up the usual vanity hits. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:31, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How you define which organization and company really notable and deserve its own Wikipedia article? Alexander Iskandar (talk) 08:42, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please review 108 articles in Category:Privately held companies of Malaysia and 90 articles in Category:Companies listed on the Malaysia Exchange. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 08:47, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Alexander Iskandar - See corporate notability guidelines. Also see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:52, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Are we ready to review every article in Category:Privately held companies of Malaysia and Category:Companies listed on the Malaysia Exchange? Too many articles in these categories already being created by a number of different contributors over the past few years with notability issue. Do you think it is acceptable to delete those articles with notability issue? Alexander Iskandar (talk) 17:22, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Alexander Iskandar - Again, see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Any particular article is reviewed on its own, and the existence of other articles is not an argument to keep an article that has been nominated for deletion. Any registered editor may nominate any of the existing articles for deletion, and we can review them when they are nominated. As to the question, do I think it is acceptable to delete articles with notability issues, you probably know the answer; I think that Wikipedia policy is satisfactory, and that any article that is nominated for deletion should be reviewed as to its notability, and, if the consensus is that it is not notable, it should be deleted. If you disagree with the policy, go to Village pump (policy) or some other policy forum. If you don't want this article reviewed for deletion, please provide a policy-based reason why it should not be reviewed for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:16, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do you review those articles in Category:Privately held companies of Malaysia and Category:Companies listed on the Malaysia Exchange? Alexander Iskandar (talk) 18:38, 7 April 2017 (UTC)][reply]

If that was necessary before nominating a single article for deletion, Alexander Iskandar, then very few articles that are members of categories would ever be nominated for deletion. We take an article-by-article approach at AfD. If you think that other articles in the category should be deleted, then please go ahead and nominate them. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:51, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is it possible to create Draft:Pengurusan Aset Air Berhad? Alexander Iskandar (talk) 07:24, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. NgYShung ^huh? 07:28, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. NgYShung ^huh? 07:28, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article provides no evidence of evidence of notability. Maproom (talk) 08:52, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A focussed WP:BEFORE search demonstrates that the only reliable sources pertaining to the company only do so in passing, with little WP:DEPTH of coverage, and even then, they are mostly in the context of the parent organization, which, being a Finance Ministry is notable in its own right. However, WP:NOTINHERITED, of course. — O Fortuna^{velut luna...} 12:03, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, everything else has been said by above editors. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:27, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Blatant WP:PROMO.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:32, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.