Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peasant's Quest

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — CharlotteWebb 09:37, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Peasant's Quest

Seems to fail WP:WEB - according to [1] the only sites that have any information on this are like gamefaqs and "homestar runner wiki". Non-notable flash game. froth^T 00:48, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. Garrett^Talk 01:14, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• keep or Merge/redirect I dunno, 27,000 google hits is a lot, and it's part of the eminently notable Homestar Runner. I added a source from the Ottawa Citizen, which should speak to its notability. — brighterorange (talk) 02:05, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Here's a dirty great interview with the creators from well-regarded site adventuregamers, here's a little review from Netjak (hardly top-end, but a named reviewer and scores), this game and at least one other by the same dev has been featured on the UK's Channel 4 website. I believe that's more than enough for notability. QuagmireDog 04:12, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per QuagmireDog. JuJube 06:47, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep *Mishatx*-In\Out 08:13, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Homestar Runner. Of the two provided references, only one is a reliable source. The other is a game review submitted by an anonymous reader. As such, there isn't multiple independent sources, thus my recommendation to merginate. -- Whpq 17:20, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Which reference are you talking about? There's also a review from the Ottawa Citizen, which surely counts as a WP:RS. — brighterorange (talk) 18:49, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - sorry, I missed the Ottawa Citizen. -- Whpq 19:11, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep per Brighterorange; subject is sourced and borderline notable. That said, I wouldn't mind a merge to Homestar Runner, and a couple more sources wouldn't hurt either. --Alan Au 23:00, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Anything H*R is notable. Nardman1 01:59, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, but needs more citations. Smee 10:21, 27 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]
• Keep: spinoff of a notable franchise. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 01:18, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.