Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pazikas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete as G7 - author request. Other criteria may have applied as well (Test page, perhaps, as a malformed disambiguation page, or context for much the same reason), but consensus below seems clear. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 13:50, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pazikas

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Speedy declined, stated that a fuller investigation needed. Unable to determine notability or relevance. GregJackP (talk) 00:27, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can't even verify existence of such a clan. The International Register of Arms quoted appears to be a website where you pay to be published [1]. Ray^Talk 02:34, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete A1 - Lacks sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Specifically, I'm unable to determine whether sources from a Google search might be relevant because I honestly have no clue what the article is talking about or what content it might be trying to describe. - DustFormsWords (talk) 02:50, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I concur, but apparently the admin did not, thus we are at the AfD process... (GregJackP (talk) 11:40, 22 March 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Delete Insufficient context, no indication of notability. NawlinWiki (talk) 14:48, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lithuania-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:12, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Pazikas has been informed by The Armorial Register that since publishing the web page further information has come to light which has resulted in our having to remove his entry in its entirety.

We have been informed by a consultant whose expertise is in the XVth century nobility of North eastern Poland and Western Belarus and who has published works on the Lithuanian elites of the XVth century that having inquired further it is now apparent that the existence of an armigerous Radwan-Pazikas (Pazik, Pazikas) line from the XVth century is apparently simply a fantasy. We can not therefore accept that Mr. Pazikas has a right to use these armorial bearings or that he is of noble stock. The Armorial Register —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.172.78.116 (talk) 17:05, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as insufficient context. If the IP comment above is accurate, then this is apparently a hoax as well. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 17:50, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Article has been blanked by creator, which can usually be taken as a request for deletion. - DustFormsWords (talk) 22:42, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.