Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paymentsense

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Enigma^msg 23:25, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Paymentsense

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to meet WP:NCORP. They generate a lot of PR coverage from conducting surveys but the company itself receives no coverage. SmartSE (talk) 10:11, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 10:19, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 10:19, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 10:19, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 10:19, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kirbanzo (talk) 17:59, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete I'm inclined to go with nom - they receive a lot of mentions in various places, but only a few meeting WP:SIGCOV, including the actual Financial Times ref. The other bits are fasttrack working with the FT, and their paragraphs on each company on the list come across as more like advertising rather than reliable sources. Nothing else cropped up in my WP:BEFORE sweep. Nosebagbear (talk) 13:13, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: More comments needed to form a consensus
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — F R ⁺ 06:01, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A run-of-the-mill company with no indications of notability. None of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability. Fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 13:17, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.