Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paxos Trust Company

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist (+) 14:52, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Paxos Trust Company

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-distinctive cryptocurrency company. the references sre mere notices DGG ( talk ) 10:08, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:12, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:12, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:27, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have a COI here so not voting, but I believe these pieces from Fortune, the New York Times, CNBC, TechCrunch, Reuters, the Wall Street Journal and CNBC again qualify as significant coverage. Also pinging @Nightenbelle, Timtempleton, and Rosguill:, who have been involved in this article in the past, to weigh in if they'd like. Thanks! Mary Gaulke (talk) 00:09, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - Coverage is mostly routine, but a fair amount of it is in very reputable publications. It's certainly a cut above most of the business spam that we usually see here at AfD, although it appears to struggle to cross the NCORP hurdle. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 00:27, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - responding to ping. I just looked them up and they are the fifth largest unicorn of April 2021 [[1]]. Along with the coverage cited above, they meet the standards of notability. TimTempleton ^(talk) ^(cont) 17:47, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.