Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pauline Mole

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Adrian Mole#Family. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:03, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pauline Mole

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a non-notable topic, which should be merged to Adrian Mole: there are no references, and perhaps a List of Adrian Mole characters would be better suited to hold this information. Mat ty.007 07:48, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:28, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Adrian Mole#Family; insufficient coverage found to warrant a standalone article. Gongshow talk 23:50, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:28, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Adrian Mole#Family. No independent notability, no need to separate article. The Adrian Mole article already gives a sufficient amount of information on the character, so it is not really worth merging any of the content. Moswento ^talky 09:00, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.