Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Tran

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:45, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Tran

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is an orphan that does not clearly qualify under WP:GNG. None of the page sources are trusted WP:RS/PS sources, several are primary in nature, featuring interview content, and most are also promotional WP:PROMOTION in nature. NB: The page was created by a user blocked for multiple account abuse WP:SOC. Iskandar 323 (talk) 09:53, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Iskandar 323 (talk) 09:53, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:55, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:55, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rhode Island-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:55, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 10:17, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG Not notable enough to justify a Wikipedia article and there is not significant coverage.RamotHacker (talk) 21:34, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete For all of the reasons above, and for lack of any objections or counterpoints. Iskandar 323 (talk) 09:29, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.