Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Nemenyi
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep per consensus. (closed by non-admin) RMHED (talk) 16:51, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Paul Nemenyi
Non notable: no assertion of notability except that he was the possible father of Bobby Fischer; but being the father of a famous person does not make one notable - see WP:BIO. Peter Ballard (talk) 10:36, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep – Could make a small claim to notoriety as shown here [1]. In addition, a couple of hits in Google Scholar and Google News Shoessss | Chat 13:43, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. No problem with sources: several mentions in issues of American Mathematical Monthly, 1942-1952, and obituaries in Science, 29 August 1952, Vol. 116. no. 3009, pp. 215 - 216; and Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 1953, 43, pp. 62-63 (I only have access to the bibliographical references, not to the obituaries themselves, so can someone with access check them and reference them as appropriate?). One odd thing, but perhaps a result of him being a "secret scientist", is that the positions ascribed to him in the WP article don't quite match those in the AMM: e.g. "Hanford Nuclear Reservation in Hanford, Washington" in the former, "Naval Ordnance Laboratory, White Oak, Maryland" in the latter. --Paularblaster (talk) 01:39, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Scientific career alone is sufficient to keep. Quale (talk) 19:31, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The fact that Science considered him notable enough to publish an obituary makes him notable enough for Wikipedia. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:14, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.