Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Burton (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NAC. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 20:26, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Burton

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article does not indicate the notability of this person. This person has published a lot. I have not found any writing about this person going a Google search and looking through the first 30 hits. The article was previously deleted in 2008. Blue Rasberry (talk) 23:25, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Journalist - gets mentioned in the press occasionally, I can't see a notable person - open to being convinced. Off2riorob (talk) 03:28, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. After a fairly extensive Google + Google News search, I found plenty of things written by him, but nothing written about him. I also agree that there's nothing in the article itself that indicates notability. — Mr. Stradivarius ^♫ 09:11, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Fails WP:BIO notability criteria. Vanity article. Keb25 (talk) 15:37, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, no indication of notability, and insufficient coverage in reliable sources. -- Irn (talk) 12:10, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As per nominator, no indication of notability, and insufficient coverage in reliable sources. --Gelobet sei (talk) 09:46, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.