Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Bigley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:19, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Bigley

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

per wp:BIO and WP:GNG Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 18:51, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 18:52, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I happened to notice the PROD was removed today in lieu of adding a source, but he is in fact not notable as his works are simply trivial and unconvincing, searches found nothing but listings, simply nothing else beyond it. SwisterTwister talk 18:55, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I'm been doing} 19:32, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.