Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Thomas O’Connor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:49, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Thomas O’Connor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Do the business accomplishments rise to the level of encyclopedic notability? Pianotech ^{Talk to me!}/_Contribs 01:07, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• No comments? Pianotech ^{Talk to me!}/_Contribs 00:28, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:38, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. O'Connor does not meet the notability requirements for inclusion in WP. To be notable he must have received "significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject", which he has not. The very little coverage available is trivial in that they are articles quoting him, not about him. Wikipeterproject (talk) 09:21, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Agree with above comment. Pianotech ^{Talk to me!}/_Contribs 12:42, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.