Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick McGuinn

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2016 October 8.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:21, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick McGuinn

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC. No coverage in reliable secondary sources. Fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:FILMMAKER. Magnolia677 (talk) 04:03, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable filmmaker.John Pack Lambert (talk) 08:21, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:07, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:07, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The Filmaker has some good references and even a feature in variety (Magazine) "Variety Article". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tjeffersonkk (talk • contribs) 23 August 2016 (UTC)— Tjeffersonkk (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Delete: Utterly NN filmmaker. While his films have garnered some coverage, he has not, failing WP:GNG and every other measure of WP:NOTABILITY known to wiki editors. Toddst1 (talk) 20:41, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep: - Sadly this article needs more references, the subject isn't (yet) notable for inclusion, but maybe in the future - or unless more references can be sourced. 80.193.74.158 (talk) 15:23, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:07, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:23, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 18:24, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- the article lacks RS and does not present meaningful biographical information on the subject. The Variety source referenced above is (a very brief) "Review: ‘Sun Kissed’" -- which is about the movie, not the subject. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:33, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.