Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick A. Reid
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Hut 8.5 07:47, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- DRV overturns to a CSD G4 speedy deletion. Xoloz (talk) 13:07, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Patrick A. Reid
- Patrick A. Reid (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Well, let's begin with asking ourselves a few question (inspired by wikipedia guideline). Is/Has 1)The person regarded as an important figure or widely cited by their peers or successors? 2)The person known for originating a significant new concept, theory or technique? 3)The person created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, which has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews? 4)The person's work either (a) become a significant monument, (b) been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) won significant critical attention, or (d) represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries, museums or internationally significant libraries. ? Now, let's not lie to ourselves anymore Thisarticleisundueandneedbeerased 00:40, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - has "won significant critical attention" (several awards it seems), and in any case has had his work published. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 01:26, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 12:39, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 203.221.239.39 05:45, 11 November 2007 (UTC) — 203.221.239.39 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. After close comment. -- Jreferee t/c 07:38, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - has won significant critical attention KNyholm 11:23, 12 November 2007 (UTC) (After close comment. This user is a sock puppet of Alex Buchet, and has been blocked indefinitely. -- Jreferee t/c 07:38, 18 November 2007 (UTC))[reply]
- Keep held in internationally significant libraries. Library of Australia, State Library NSW. Bobsbasement 08:25, 13 November 2007 (UTC) (After close comment. This user has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia -- Jreferee t/c 07:38, 18 November 2007 (UTC))[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.