Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pathways Schools

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:40, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pathways Schools

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another non-notable school in India with much of the sourcing coming from the school's website, a site that mentions the school in passing, or a promotional article. Nothing really about the notability of the school. It should be noted that the article creator, now blocked permanently, has a similar name as the school for their username. Clearly a conflict of interest. The article has no bearing to remain as is. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:51, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:17, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:17, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:17, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. I can find a story about a Pathways librarian, Pathways during covid, a failed audit, so it's possible it could pass WP:GNG if a few solid sources were found. I can't, though. tedder (talk) 17:00, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously deleted via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:58, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting again.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – The Grid (talk) 17:49, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

delete The sources provided by Tedder clearly aren't enough to get it over the bar and I couldn't find anything else, usable or otherwise either. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:39, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.