Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PathAI

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:06, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

PathAI

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promo piece on an interesting but ultimately non-notable company. Sourcing consists of primary sources (mostly company websites), press release regurgitations, and a few scientific publications that don't mention the company let alone provide sigcov. Fails WP:GNG / WP:COMPANY / WP:ORGCRIT. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:26, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:26, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:26, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:26, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:26, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:26, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:26, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Primary sources include not only the website of several companies, but also studies funded by the company. There is essentially no coverage by independent secondary sources. Isabelle ^🏳‍🌈 13:22, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Search shows no significant secondary coverage, just lots of press releases. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 14:06, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am unable to find significant coverage and the subject fails the criteria for establishing notability. Spkabil (talk) 04:45, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non notable content, no reliable sources present. TimothyStellar (talk) 09:23, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.