Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pastor S.O Oladele

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. ✗plicit 12:08, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Samuel Oladele (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Rejected at WP:AFC fails WP:GNG. Theroadislong (talk) 08:30, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Religion, and Nigeria. Theroadislong (talk) 08:30, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:35, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep (but rename to S. O. Oladele; "Pastor" doesn't belong in the title). He's the head of a significant Nigerian church, with quite a few articles on Google News. But, as @A. B.: pointed out in the page history, Nigerian news sources are tricky to evaluate, so I'm not confident.— Moriwen (talk) 15:32, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Head of a major church, but rename to S. O. Oladele as above. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:23, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: I just blocked the editor for obvious UPE/COI editing. Drmies (talk) 16:14, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. I think it's important to realise that while this article is terribly written, it can be saved, because there is SIGCOV and a multitude of reliable sources available online. I'm not interested in trying to revive it only for it to get deleted, but if it is kept I think all it needs is a bit of TLC and it'll be perfectly fine. Obviously, it needs moving, but that's not an issue for here. Thanks, JacobTheRox (talk) 10:57, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.