Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Past
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. April Fools has ended (non-admin closure) -KAP03(Talk • Contributions • Email) 00:39, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Past
![]() | This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
- Past (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
no citation, even though this article is 13 years old, still a stub. lets nuke it. DiamondMiner7OnWHEELz!april fools!ProDuct0339 07:33, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- Comment by the way, if we delete this, it will cause a time paradox, therefore, with this experiment's data, we can Travel to past! DiamondMiner7OnWHEELz!april fools!ProDuct0339 07:40, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect to Future. Kerl126 (talk) 10:00, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete The universe according to thermodynamics is just another Markov process, which means that given a present state we cannot determine a past state. Thus, should be deleted per WP:NONSENSE 128.174.162.241 (talk) 10:08, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- Userfy to God speedy AMG: Affalterbach Maniac Grüppen (the best or nothing) 12:08, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- Let it go. The past is in the past.[April Fools!] HalfHeartedFanatic (talk) 12:13, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete Filled with original research about a possible hoax, reflist is plagued with unreliable sources from ludicrous websites such as WaybackMachine (!!). And then salt to prevent re-creation. Lord High Permanent Senior Undersectretary to L3X1 (talk) 12:19, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect to Uranus because why not? 192.17.168.77 (talk) 17:56, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- Merge in to Present cos why not. –Davey2010Talk 21:11, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.