Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Passivdom

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Created in violation of a block, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bodiadub. ST47 (talk) 17:37, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Passivdom

Passivdom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is unambiguous spam. Can't be nominated for speedy deletion because it already has been in the past. Puzzledvegetable|💬|📧|📜 18:59, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:51, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:52, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep - I fixed it. Size now = notability and promo is gone. I say keep the pretty logo but I won't cry if you delete that too, I admit its not notably enough to support it and probably violates WP:Copyright. Coffeeluvr613 (talk) 23:38, 5 July 2019 (UTC) Comments by blocked user removed by Willy No1lakersfan (Talk - Edits) 12:37, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The user above removed all but the intro to the article and the infobox, which I undid. If the edit would help make the article worth keeping, I will go ahead and undo my edit. --Willy No1lakersfan (Talk - Edits) 00:15, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:50, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.